Perception of risk of adverse drug reactions with non-opioid analgesics by medical students
Датум постављања документа
2020Аутори
Станојевић, Зорица
Ћорац, Александар
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Introduction
Educationaboutadversedrugreactions(ADRs)
for public, healthcareprofessionalsand medical
studentsis the mostimpoftantfor reducingof druginducedpatientharm.
Somestudieshavealreadyinvestigatedpatient's
knowledgeaboutprescribedmedicines(Cullenet al.,
2006). Bongard et al. (2002) have shown major
differencesin the perception of risk of ADRs
betweenhealthandnon-healthprofessionals. In this
particular study, non-health professionals and
pharmacistsdid not rank high non-steroidalantiinflammatorydrugs(NSAIDs) for perceivedrisk of
ADRs compared to general practitioners and
pharmacovigilanceprofessional.Montastrucet al.
(2003)founddifferencesin theperceptionofrisks of
gastrointestinalADRs with NSAIDs, including
coxibsamongphysiciansaccordingto their medical
specialization. Rheumatologists systematically
consideredNSAIDs as less harmful than general
practitionersandgastroenterologists. Thisresultmay
indicate that these physiciansare involved more
frequently in NSAID-induced ADRs than
rheumatologists.
Dift-erencesin ADR risk perceptionhasbeen
illustratedin a study of French medical students
(Dunieuet al.,2007).The studyassessed the effecr
of educationon students'perceptionof ADR risks
factors.Before taking a pharmacologycoursethe
studentsrankedNSAIDs in eightposition,aspirinin
twelfth position.After the coursethe order of risk
perceptionschangedto NSAIDs to fifth positionand
aspirin to fourth position. These results indicate
significanceof educationon improving medication
prescribing.
The aim of the studywas to evaluateperceived
risk of ADRs with non-opioidanalgesics in young
medical studentsand to investigatethe impact of
medicaleducationontheirperceptionof risk.
Materials and methods
A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based studywas
conductedamongmedicalstudentsof first andsixth
yearof studyon Facultyof Medicine,Universityof
Pri5tina- KosovskaMitrovica. The approvalfrom
Ethics Committeeeof the institution was obtained
beforethestartofthe study.
The study was conductedfor the period of 2
monthsfrom April throughMay,2019.
The total number of respondentswas 205, of
whom45 wereexcludedbecauseof incompletedata.
The paper-basedquestionnairewas designedsothat
* zorica.stanoj evic@med.pr. ac.rs88
the respondentscould selectmorethan oneanswer,
or entertheappropriatedata.
The questionnairewas divided into 3 sections.
The first section included demographic
informationabout students. The second section
investigatedthe respondents'perceptionof risk of
ADRsnext classes o[ non-opioid analgesics:
paracetamol, aspirin, indomethacin for indolic
derivatesNSAIDs, piroxicam for oxicam derivates
NSAIDs, diclofenac for arylcarboxylic derivates
NSAIDs androfecocibfor coxibs.The third section
investigated the risk of ulcerogenic actrvity.
gastroiniestinal bleeding,liver and kidney damage,
bronchospasmandthromboembolismassociated with
theuseof eachclassof non-opioidanalgesics.
A visual-analoguescale (VAS) was used to
definea scorefor the perceivedrisk of ADRs, The
scoreswerecomparedusingMann-WhitneyU test.
Differenceswereconsideredto besignificantif thep
valuewaslessthan0.05.
Resultsand discussion
A totalof 78 medicalstudentsof thefirst (MSl)
and81 medicalstudentsof the sixth (MS6) yearof
study completed the questionnaire giving the
responserate of 78Vo.63Voof respondentswere
femaleand37% weremale.Therewasa significant
agedifferencebetweenthe groups(19.6 vs. 23.6,
p<0.001).
Both groupof studentsrankedindolic derivates
of NSAIDsandcoxibsasthemostdangerousclasses
of non-opioid analgesicswith high potentialsfor
ADRs. Also, they consideredthat paracetamol was
the least dangerousnon-opioid analgesic.When
NSAIDs and coxibs were consideredtogether,the
globalmedianscoreof perceivedrisk of ADRs was
4.5vs.4.7(MSl vs.MS6),whichwasa statistically
very significantdifference(p<0.001).Clearly,at the
end of their study,medical studentsbecomemore
cautiousin the perceptionof risk of ADRs.Earlier
studies have shown that NSAIDs were the
pharmacological classmost frequentlyinvolved in
hospital admissionsdue to anadverseeffect of a
prescribeddrug(Pouyanneet al.,2000).
For NSAIDs, MS6 gave significantly higher
median scores of perceived "digestive risk" than
MSi (6.1 vs. 5.1, p=0.020). But unexpected,the
perceived "thromboembolism risk" associated with
the use of NSAIDs (including coxibs) was higher in
MSI thanMS6 (5.8vs.4.8, p=0.007).
Conclusion
These results indicate that medical education
gives young medical studentsa better understanding
of the risks of potential ADRs.However, their
perception of risk indicates the need for further
education. Besides the influence of medical
educations, other important factors, like information
in the various media, have to be considered to
explain the difference in the perception of risks
related to drugs.
References
Bongard,V., M6nard-Tach6, S., Bagheri,H., Kabiri, K.,
Lapeyre-Mestre, M., Montastruc, J.L., 2002.
Perceptionof the risk of adversedrug reactions:
differencesbetween health professionalsand nonhealthprofessionals. Br. J. Clin.Pharmacol. 54,433-
436.
Cullen, G., Kelly, 8., Murray, F.E., 2006. Patients
knowledge of adverse reactions to current
medications. Br. J.Clin.Pharmacol. 62,232-236.
Durrieu,G., Hurault,C., Bongard,V., Damase-Michel,
C., Montastruc,J.L., 2007. Perceptionof risk of
adversedrugreactionsby medicalstudents: influence
of a l-year pharmacologicalcourse.Br. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. 64.233-236.
Montastruc, J.L.,Bongard, V., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., 2003.
Perceptionof therisk of gastrointestinal adversedrug
reactionswith non-steroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs
(includingcoxibs): differences among general
practitioners, gastroenterologists and
rheumatologists. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.59, 685-
688.
Pouyanne, P., Haramburu,F., Imbs, J.L., B6gaud,8.,
2000. Admissions to hospital causedby adverse
reactions: crosssectional incidencestudv.Br. Med.J.
320,1036
М категорија
M33openAccess
M33
openAccess