dc.contributor.author | Tančić, Dragan Lj. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elezović, Dalibor M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gordić, Miodrag | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-08T09:10:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-08T09:10:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://platon.pr.ac.rs/handle/123456789/341 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses the issue of the specificities of the relationship of the comparative and the
historical methods in the research of political history. We find examples of the relationship of the
comparative and the historical methods in the research of political history in works of modern
historiography. Contemporary political history studies various forms of political reality, a variety of
themes and those subject to fad, like other branches of history. The analysis has shown that all general
scientific methods, particularly the historical method, as well as the comparative method, enable the
scientific cognition of social, historical and political phenomena and processes, which also applies to the
research of political history | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | Ауторство-Некомерцијално-Без прерада 3.0 САД | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.title | The Specificities of the Relationship of the Comparative and the Historical Methods in the Research of Political History | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.type | clanak-u-casopisu | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/mjss-2018-0025 | |
dc.citation.volume | 9 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.spage | 55 | |
dc.citation.epage | 60 | |
dc.subject.keywords | methodology, political history, comparative method, historical method | en_US |
dc.type.mCategory | M24 | en_US |
dc.type.mCategory | openAccess | en_US |
dc.type.mCategory | M24 | en_US |
dc.type.mCategory | openAccess | en_US |